Divorce  Financial Planning
Home Page
Home Page
Conferences
ADFP Member Handbook
Join The ADFP
Chapters
ADFP
Upcoming Events
Webinars
Board Of Directors
Professional Members
Contact Us
Privacy Notice

Find a Member
ADFP Blog
Press Releases
Financial Planning
Alimony/Spousal Maintenance
Divorce & Insurance
Social Security
Collaborative Divorce
Forensic Divorce Accounting
Divorce Articles
Divorce Calculators
Divorce Handbook
Client Handbook
Divorce Dictionary
Featured Sites



The Association of Divorce Financial Planners (ADFP) is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be addressed to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 150 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 700, Nashville, TN, 37219-2417. Web site: www.nasbatools.com.



How Pension Benefits Can Be Divided

The "Immediate Offset" Approach
Under this method, the present value of the pension benefits are calculated and a determination is made as to that portion of the present value that was earned during the marriage. The court awards the pension to the employee spouse, and the non-employee spouse receives other marital property of offsetting value.

Advantages:
(1) It results in a final settlement of the distribution of the retirement benefits.

(2) Continuing court enforcement and supervision is not required.

(3) The parties to the divorce are free from future entanglements.

(4) The non-employee spouse does not have to establish and maintain contact with the pension plan administrator.

(5) The non-employee spouse does not have to worry about and/or guard against the possibility of the employee spouse changing pension plan beneficiaries.

(6) The non-employee spouse does share, to some extent, the risk of the employee spouse not receiving benefits, because the present value of the pension benefit does reflect actuarial discounts for contingencies that might prevent realization.

Disadvantages:
(1) The employee spouse bears the brunt of the risk of not receiving the pension benefit.

(2) Offsetting pension benefits with liquid assets affords the non-employee spouse an opportunity for greater immediate economic gain.

The "Deferred Distribution" or Reserve Jurisdiction Approach
Under this method, the court retains jurisdiction and allocates the benefits between the parties when they actually paid.

Advantages:
(1) Each spouse shares equitably in the risk of forfeiture.

(2) The court can divide and distribute the pension benefits in terms of monies actually paid.

Disadvantages:
(1) By prolonging the date of final distribution of assets, you can also prolong the hostilities between the spouses.

(2) The employee spouse could choose certain benefit options that would have an adverse effect on the non-employee spouse's portion.

(3) The non-employee spouse could forget about his/her interest in the employee's pension rights.

Return to the Pensions Page